Search for: "Hood v. United States District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
And:For example, it was this Texas appeals court that directly and deliberately defied the Justices in Miller-El v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
This case, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on claims of patent infringement, was brought on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The first case the court cites Marbury v Madison, which is one of the first cases that every law student in this country studies because it is the first case in which the United States Supreme Court explained the boundaries of its jurisdiction and the importance of the separation of powers. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:27 am
In its motion, the defendant sought a transfer of the action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:45 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
(…) The district court erred in dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, et al. closely, we were delighted to see that the Supreme Court upheld the laws of twenty-four states (and impacts every state) which limit the uses of forum-selection clauses in construction contracts. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, et al. closely, we were delighted to see that the Supreme Court upheld the laws of twenty-four states (which impacts every state) to limit the uses of forum-selection clauses in construction contracts. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:02 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, No. 12-929, slip op. at 11 (U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am
Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana further shored up the clearly delineated avenues for recovery available to plaintiffs involved in Jones Act and personal injury suits arising under general maritime law. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am
Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana further shored up the clearly delineated avenues for recovery available to plaintiffs involved in Jones Act and personal injury suits arising under general maritime law. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 8:53 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:58 pm
Zimmer:Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products (collectively “Zimmer”) appealfrom the final judgment of the United States DistrictCourt for the Western District of Michigan that U.S. [read post]
